Advertisement. The page you requested will display in seconds.
Advertisement. The page you requested will display in seconds.
*If you were to take the same photo of your family in front of a landscape with several different cameras, each camera would reproduce the colors of the landscape and your family’s faces differently. Some cameras will saturate blues and greens, making landscapes more brilliant, but less realistic. Some cameras will adjust reds and yellows, making some faces more enlivened, and others appear flushed. We test color accuracy by photographing an industry standard GretagMacbeth ColorChecker test chart, and comparing the known colors of the chart with the colors the camera reproduces. The ColorChecker consists of 24 colored tiles, each representing a commonly photographed color or an example from around the color spectrum.
The image below shows how the GE A830’s colors compare to the actual colors of the test chart. The outside squares show the colors the camera reproduced, the inside squares show the actual colors of the test chart corrected for luminance, and the inner rectangles show the actual colors of the test chart under a perfectly even exposure.
If you look at the outer squares compared to the inner squares, you can see that almost every color is off. The yellows look green, the blues look purple, and almost every color appears duller than it should. The graph below shows this information in another way. The background of the graph shows the entire color spectrum, and the ideal colors of the test chart are shown as squares, while the camera’s colors are shown as circles. The length of the lines connecting the squares and circles shows the color error.
The graph confirms the significant color error seen in the image of the ColorChecker. Many colors drift away from their ideal values, especially yellows, greens, and blues. These colors will greatly affect landscape photos, making foliage look bluish, and skies turn purple. In addition to the color shifts, almost every color is significantly undersaturated, which will make your photos appear less vibrant.
The A830 has another issue with color that is rarely seen in production-level digital cameras. As you can clearly see in the still life images below, half of the image frame is a different color tint than the other half. This becomes more obvious when ISO sensitivity is increased. It is almost as if half of the frame was not white balanced, while the other half was. This is a huge problem, and one that GE needs to address. It makes shooting at ISO sensitivities above 400 almost impossible.
We test resolution by photographing an industry standard resolution test chart at varied focal lengths and exposure settings. We then run the images through Imatest, which determines resolution in terms of line widths per picture height (lw/ph), which correspond to the number of equally spaced alternating black and white lines the camera can discern before blurring them. The 8-megapixel A830 captured its sharpest images at ISO 80, f/4.8, and a focal length of 18mm. At these settings, resolution was impressive, recording 1880 lw/ph horizontally with 2 percent oversharpening, and 1633 lw/ph vertically with 13.7 percent undersharpening. The vertical undersharpening is a bit of a concern however, meaning some high contrast lines will look soft. Also, the A830 was very inconsistent. The resolution at slightly different exposure settings was very different from the resolution recorded above, so you can only expect this camera to occasionally produce really sharp photos.
Additionally, the A830 has significant chromatic aberration ("color fringing") and blurring at the edges of its photos. You may get some sharp photos of your subjects in the center of the frame, but the edges will be blurry and artificially-colored.
Noise – Manual ISO*(2.08)*
Like all electronic devices, digital cameras produce signal noise. The noise is created inside a camera’s sensor, and has nothing to do with the scene being photographed. Image noise appears as speckled dots or splotches scattered randomly throughout a photo. Sometimes the noise is monochromatic, and sometimes it is colored – and almost always unwanted. We test noise levels by photographing our test chart under even studio lab lighting at different ISO sensitivities.
The graph above shows the noise levels, measured in the percentage of the image the noise drowns out, at each ISO setting. Noise intrinsically escalates as ISO is increased, because boosting the ISO amplifies the signal. In the GE A830, noise levels increase up to ISO 400, but then drop way off at ISO 800. As evident on closer inspection of the photos, this decrease in noise is caused by in-camera noise reduction. This noise reduction smoothes over the noise, making it less grainy, but drastically reduces image detail. This noise reduction does not make photos look better, and is an attempt to hide an incredibly noisy camera sensor. Click on the still life images below to see the effects of noise and smoothing.
Noise – Auto ISO*(0.94)*
We also evaluate the noise levels of cameras set to Auto ISO. Under bright studio lights, the A830 fired at ISO 100, with 2 percent of the image lost to noise. This is an unacceptably high amount of noise in such bright light, and results in a very poor auto noise score.
White Balance*(7.03) *
Accurate white balance is very important to proper color reproduction in photos. Poor white balance can result in color casts to photos -- sometimes obvious, sometimes subtle. If you’ve owned a camera before, you’ve probably noticed that some of your indoor photos looked extraordinarily yellow. This is a result of inaccurate white balance.
We test white balance by photographing the ColorChecker test chart under four different types of lighting: flash, fluorescent, outdoor cloudy, and tungsten. We test both the Auto white balance setting and the appropriate white balance presets, found in the Function menu.
White balance accuracy using the Auto setting is mixed. Using the flash, white balance is extremely accurate, which is great because there is no flash preset. Under outdoor shade lighting the A830 is also fairly accurate, but under fluorescent and tungsten light the accuracy is very poor.
*Under outdoor shade light, the preset is as accurate as the Auto setting. However, under fluorescent and tungsten light the accuracy is very poor, though slightly better than the Auto setting. Overall, it makes more sense to keep the camera on the Auto setting, since worrying about setting the presets is not worth the tiny advantage it gives in only a couple lighting situations.
**Still Life Sequences
***Click to view the high-resolution image.*
|Still Life Scene|
|ISO 80||ISO 80|
|*ISO 100*||ISO 100|
|ISO 200||ISO 200|
|*ISO 400*||*ISO 400*|
|*ISO 800*||*ISO 800*|
|*ISO 1600*||*ISO 1600*|
Low Light – 30 lux
We dim the studio lights to test the video performance in low light. Here the A830’s color accuracy was more accurate, though still far from ideal. Noise levels were higher than in bright light, and noise is certainly visible in the footage.
We shoot footage of our resolution test chart to test the sharpness of the video. The A830 recorded 190 lw/ph horizontally with 24.5 percent undersharpening, and 845 lw/ph vertically with 77.1 percent oversharpening. These sharpening levels are outrageous, and cause abundant image artifacting. White "ghosting" lines that shouldn’t even be there are clearly visible next to the dark edges on the resolution chart. These ridiculous low scores are also due in part to problems the camera has focusing while shooting video.
We evaluate how cameras capture motion outdoors by bringing them down to the street to shoot footage of moving cars and pedestrians. This is where the problems with the A830’s video are most obvious. Motion is very jerky, there is abundant moiré, the exposure flashes and changes on a whim, highlights are blown out and smear across the frame, and the whole footage looks washed out, undersaturated, and very purple. Video footage with the A830 is altogether embarrassing, so don’t buy this camera expecting anything from the Video mode.
News and Features
Facebook must be feeling pretty good about its most coveted asset.
This was an epic year in space, and we've got the photos to prove it.
Airbus put five of its new jets on the line for your viewing pleasure.
Here's how to take advantage of the most versatile tool in your bag.
A holiday PSA from your friends at Reviewed.com
These baby toys connect your kid to social media, for better or worse.
Meet Kenji Yamaguchi, the genius behind NatGeo's most stunning photos.
Forget selfies, these gadgets are for serious phone photography.
From beards, to cats, to food, Instagram has something for everyone.
Sign up to get the latest news, reviews and deals only available to our email subscribers
Thank you for subscribing!